Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill

 


The U.S. Supreme Court has recently decided to reject a bid to restrict access to the abortion pill mifepristone, ensuring that it remains available while legal challenges continue. This decision is significant as it maintains the status quo, allowing mifepristone, which is used in more than half of all U.S. abortions, to be accessible at least through next year. The case originated from anti-abortion groups who questioned the FDA's approval and regulation of the drug, arguing that the process was flawed and sought to impose national restrictions​.

During the oral arguments, justices from both conservative and liberal wings expressed skepticism about the claims brought by the plaintiffs. Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, who are pivotal votes in this case, questioned whether the anti-abortion doctors could prove concrete injuries from treating patients who had taken the pill, and whether a national injunction was justified. The court seemed inclined to reject the sweeping nationwide relief sought by the plaintiffs, which would have rolled back FDA policies facilitating easier access to mifepristone​.

President Joe Biden lauded the court's decision, emphasizing its importance for safeguarding women's health and urging voters to support legislative efforts to restore abortion rights. The ruling means that mifepristone will continue to be available, and the legal battle over its access will likely influence upcoming elections as abortion rights remain a central issue​.

Related Quires,

Supreme court  

united states America

Washington post

trend news in USA

breaking news



Post a Comment

1 Comments

Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest Record: What is the record for most hot dogs eaten in 10 minutes